GeForce GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRV370GT200B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2004 (20 years ago)27 November 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data216
Core clock speed400 MHz576 MHz
Number of transistors107 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)36 Watt171 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60041.47
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5365 TFLOPS
ROPs428
TMUs472

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB896 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz999 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s111.9 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 27 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 896 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 36 Watt 171 Watt

ATI X600 has 375% lower power consumption.

GTX 260 216 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 250% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X600 and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X600
Radeon X600
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate Radeon X600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 11 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.