GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs ATI Radeon X300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated71
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.99
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV370GA104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 September 2004 (20 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5632
Core clock speed375 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors107 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)36 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate1.500248.2
Floating-point processing powerno data15.88 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs4176
Tensor Coresno data176
Ray Tracing Coresno data44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 36 Watt 115 Watt

ATI X300 has 219.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X300 and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X300 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X300
Radeon X300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 31 vote

Rate Radeon X300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 858 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.