GeForce Go 7400T vs ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRV370G72
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 October 2006 (18 years ago)1 February 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed325 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors107 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.3001.800
ROPs42
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz450 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s7.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.09.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 October 2006 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 110 nm 90 nm

ATI X300 SE HyperMemory has an age advantage of 8 months.

Go 7400T, on the other hand, has a 22.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory and GeForce Go 7400T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory is a desktop card while GeForce Go 7400T is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400T
GeForce Go 7400T

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7400T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.