GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs ATI Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

ATI X1950 CrossFire Edition
2006
512 MB GDDR4
0.36

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q outperforms ATI X1950 CrossFire Edition by a whopping 3417% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1310414
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.86
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameR580+GP107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 September 2006 (18 years ago)3 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed650 MHz1152 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1417 MHz
Number of transistors384 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate10.4068.02
Floating-point processing powerno data2.177 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs1648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s112.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VHDCINo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI X1950 CrossFire Edition 0.36
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 12.66
+3417%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X1950 CrossFire Edition 151
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 5305
+3413%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−5600%
57
+5600%
1440p0−129
4K0−119

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Sons of the Forest 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 67
+0%
67
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Sons of the Forest 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
+0%
57
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Sons of the Forest 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+0%
46
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 94
+0%
94
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Sons of the Forest 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Sons of the Forest 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
+0%
36
+0%
Metro Exodus 5
+0%
5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+0%
20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Sons of the Forest 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how ATI X1950 CrossFire Edition and GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 5600% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 12.66
Recency 10 September 2006 3 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q has a 3416.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 6 votes

Rate Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 111 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition or GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.