GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1340not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.25no data
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameR580G96C
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 January 2006 (19 years ago)27 August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed625 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors384 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate10.004.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed725 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth46.4 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 January 2006 27 August 2008
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

9400 GT Rev. 2 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 63.6% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition and GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition or GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.