ATI Graphics Ultra Pro vs ATI Radeon X1900 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)no data
GPU code nameR580Mach32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 January 2006 (18 years ago)1 January 1993 (31 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed625 MHz10 MHz
Number of transistors384 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.00no data
ROPs161
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16VLB
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3VRAM
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed725 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth46.4 GB/s80.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)None
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)None
OpenCLN/ANone
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 January 2006 1 January 1993
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 800 nm

ATI X1900 XT has an age advantage of 13 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 788.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1900 XT and Graphics Ultra Pro. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1900 XT
Radeon X1900 XT
ATI Graphics Ultra Pro
Graphics Ultra Pro

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 29 votes

Rate Radeon X1900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.