GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon X1600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1329not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.49no data
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV530G96C
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)25 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed590 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors157 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)42 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate2.3608.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-II
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed690 MHz792 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.08 GB/s25.34 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2007 25 October 2008
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 42 Watt 23 Watt

9600M GT Mac Edition has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 63.6% more advanced lithography process, and 82.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1600 XT and GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1600 XT is a desktop card while GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1600 XT
Radeon X1600 XT
NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition
GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 42 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.