RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated62
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.57
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV530no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistors157 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate2.000no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsFloppyno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed390 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.48 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2007 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 115 Watt

ATI X1600 PRO AGP has 180.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1600 PRO AGP is a desktop card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP
Radeon X1600 PRO AGP
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 5 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.