Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs ATI Radeon X1300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300 All-In-Wonder 2006 PCIe Edition X1300 X1300 AGP X1300 LE X1300 PRO X1300 PRO AGP X1600 SE X1650 SE
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7-Core iGPU 7-Cores iGPU 8-Core iGPU Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon X1300 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

ATI X1300
2005
256 MB DDR
0.14

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms ATI X1300 by a whopping 6650% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI X1300 Radeon X1300
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1468480
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameRV515Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 December 2005 (19 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors107 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Texture fill rate1.800no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12_2
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−125

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Sons of the Forest 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Sons of the Forest 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Sons of the Forest 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Sons of the Forest 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Sons of the Forest 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.14 9.45
Recency 1 December 2005 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 6650% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon X1300 is a desktop graphics card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

ATI Radeon X1300
Radeon X1300
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI X1300 Radeon X1300
vs
FX 5950 Ultra GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
ATI X1300 Radeon X1300
vs
ATI 9800 PRO Radeon 9800 PRO
UHD Graphics 710 Mobile UHD Graphics 710 Mobile
vs
ATI HD 4870 HD 4870
ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP 3D Rage LT PRO AGP
vs
ATI HD 3850 HD 3850
ATI X1950 PRO AGP Radeon X1950 PRO AGP
vs
ATI HD 2600 PRO HD 2600 PRO
320M Mac Edition GeForce 320M Mac Edition
vs
ATI X1300 PRO X1300 PRO
RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
ATI X1900 GT X1900 GT
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
vs
ATI 9250 Radeon 9250
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
vs
ATI 9600 Radeon 9600
Instinct MI50 Radeon Instinct MI50
vs
ATI 9600 XT Radeon 9600 XT
RX 9060 XT 8 GB Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB
vs
ATI 9800 XT Radeon 9800 XT
Radeon 660M Radeon 660M
vs
ATI 9100 Radeon 9100

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 65 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 14 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1300 or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.