Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs HD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1200not rated
Place by popularity37not in top-100
Power efficiency1.54no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2012 (13 years ago)22 June 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481792
Core clock speed650 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors392 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate6.300103.6
Floating-point processing power0.1008 TFLOPS3.315 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs6112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data274 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared3 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data240.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.801.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2012 22 June 2012
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 200 Watt

HD Graphics has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 471.4% lower power consumption.

HD 7950 Boost, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics and Radeon HD 7950 Boost. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics
HD Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost
Radeon HD 7950 Boost

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 2725 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 17 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics or Radeon HD 7950 Boost, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.