ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs ATI Radeon X1300 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRV515RV770
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2005 (19 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data800
Core clock speed600 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors107 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt151 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40030.00
ROPs416
TMUs440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz3.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s108.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 151 Watt

ATI X1300 PRO has 387.1% lower power consumption.

ATI V8700 Duo, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1300 PRO and FirePro V8700 Duo. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1300 PRO is a desktop card while FirePro V8700 Duo is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
Radeon X1300 PRO
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
FirePro V8700 Duo

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 33 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V8700 Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.