Radeon RX 6800M vs ATI X1300 PRO AGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.53
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV515Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2005 (19 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed600 MHz2116 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2390 MHz
Number of transistors107 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400382.4
Floating-point processing powerno data12.24 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 145 Watt

ATI X1300 PRO AGP has 367.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6800M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1300 PRO AGP and Radeon RX 6800M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1300 PRO AGP is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6800M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1300 PRO AGP
Radeon X1300 PRO AGP
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Radeon X1300 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 311 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.