Radeon PRO W7900 vs Vega 7

Place in the ranking	530	12
Place by popularity	39	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	16.67
Power efficiency	11.56	17.98
Architecture	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Cezanne	Navi 31
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	13 April 2021 (3 years ago)	13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	6144
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1855 MHz
Boost clock speed	1900 MHz	2495 MHz
Number of transistors	9,800 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	295 Watt
Texture fill rate	53.20	958.1
Floating-point processing power	1.702 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	192
TMUs	28	384
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	280 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	48 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	864.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	22 −900%	220−230 +900%
1440p	28 −900%	280−290 +900%
4K	20 −900%	200−210 +900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	18.18
1440p	no data	14.28
4K	no data	20.00

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.46	76.11
Recency	13 April 2021	13 April 2023
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	295 Watt

Vega 7 has 555.6% lower power consumption.

PRO W7900, on the other hand, has a 920.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.