Radeon PRO V710 vs Vega 7

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Vega 7 with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.

Vega 7
2021
45 Watt
7.08

PRO V710 outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 365% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking577179
Place by popularity11not in top-100
Power efficiency11.1114.72
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameCezanneNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 April 2021 (4 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4483456
Core clock speed300 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate53.20432.0
Floating-point processing power1.702 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs28216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared28 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared224 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.21.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−335%
100−110
+335%
1440p28
−364%
130−140
+364%
4K18
−344%
80−85
+344%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 11
−355%
50−55
+355%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−341%
150−160
+341%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−344%
80−85
+344%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
Battlefield 5 28
−364%
130−140
+364%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−341%
150−160
+341%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−364%
65−70
+364%
Far Cry 5 20
−350%
90−95
+350%
Fortnite 63
−360%
290−300
+360%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−359%
170−180
+359%
Forza Horizon 5 24
−358%
110−120
+358%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
Valorant 70−75
−305%
300−310
+305%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
Battlefield 5 23
−335%
100−105
+335%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−341%
150−160
+341%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 58
−348%
260−270
+348%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−350%
45−50
+350%
Far Cry 5 18
−344%
80−85
+344%
Fortnite 27
−344%
120−130
+344%
Forza Horizon 4 35
−357%
160−170
+357%
Forza Horizon 5 21
−352%
95−100
+352%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−341%
75−80
+341%
Metro Exodus 13
−362%
60−65
+362%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
−335%
100−105
+335%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−347%
85−90
+347%
Valorant 73
−311%
300−310
+311%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
Battlefield 5 21
−352%
95−100
+352%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−344%
40−45
+344%
Far Cry 5 18
−344%
80−85
+344%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−344%
120−130
+344%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−362%
60−65
+362%
Valorant 25
−340%
110−120
+340%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14
−364%
65−70
+364%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−353%
240−250
+353%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−362%
180−190
+362%
Valorant 48
−358%
220−230
+358%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−338%
70−75
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−344%
80−85
+344%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Valorant 25
−340%
110−120
+340%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

This is how Vega 7 and PRO V710 compete in popular games:

  • PRO V710 is 335% faster in 1080p
  • PRO V710 is 364% faster in 1440p
  • PRO V710 is 344% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.08 32.89
Recency 13 April 2021 3 October 2024
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 158 Watt

Vega 7 has 251.1% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has a 364.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2684 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 7 or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.