UHD Graphics 750 vs Radeon Vega 11 Embedded

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated657
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)no data
GPU code nameRavenRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 February 2018 (6 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704no data
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1300 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate57.2020.80
Floating-point performance1.83 gflops0.6656 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 February 2018 30 March 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has an age advantage of 3 years, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 11 Embedded and UHD Graphics 750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 750 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 17 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 370 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.