Quadro M2200 vs Radeon VII

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon VII with Quadro M2200, including specs and performance data.

Radeon VII
2019
16 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
41.89
+288%

VII outperforms M2200 by a whopping 288% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking93432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.87no data
Power efficiency9.9713.78
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameVega 20GM206
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date7 February 2019 (6 years ago)11 January 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401024
Core clock speed1400 MHz695 MHz
Boost clock speed1750 MHz1036 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate420.066.30
Floating-point processing power13.44 TFLOPS2.122 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs24064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length280 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1377 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s88 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon VII 41.89
+288%
Quadro M2200 10.79

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon VII 16483
+288%
Quadro M2200 4244

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon VII 37881
+414%
Quadro M2200 7372

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon VII 62128
+152%
Quadro M2200 24622

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon VII 27449
+369%
Quadro M2200 5850

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon VII 146094
+287%
Quadro M2200 37796

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon VII 430170
+48.8%
Quadro M2200 289176

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Radeon VII 110
+135%
Quadro M2200 47

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Radeon VII 87
+1.3%
Quadro M2200 86

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Radeon VII 19
Quadro M2200 58
+209%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Radeon VII 170
+136%
Quadro M2200 72

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Radeon VII 62
Quadro M2200 69
+10.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Radeon VII 52
+109%
Quadro M2200 25

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Radeon VII 17
+225%
Quadro M2200 5

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Radeon VII 159
+121%
Quadro M2200 72

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Radeon VII 52
+113%
Quadro M2200 25

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD125
+191%
43
−191%
1440p81
+350%
18−21
−350%
4K60
+329%
14
−329%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.59no data
1440p8.63no data
4K11.65no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
+362%
24−27
−362%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+384%
18−20
−384%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+343%
21−24
−343%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
+362%
24−27
−362%
Battlefield 5 136
+202%
45−50
−202%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+384%
18−20
−384%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+343%
21−24
−343%
Far Cry 5 99
+183%
35−40
−183%
Fortnite 195
+215%
60−65
−215%
Forza Horizon 4 163
+262%
45−50
−262%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+333%
27−30
−333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 157
+324%
35−40
−324%
Valorant 220−230
+139%
95−100
−139%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
+362%
24−27
−362%
Battlefield 5 137
+204%
45−50
−204%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+384%
18−20
−384%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+80.5%
150−160
−80.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+343%
21−24
−343%
Dota 2 160
+119%
70−75
−119%
Far Cry 5 95
+171%
35−40
−171%
Fortnite 154
+148%
60−65
−148%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+249%
45−50
−249%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+333%
27−30
−333%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+185%
35−40
−185%
Metro Exodus 88
+319%
21−24
−319%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 158
+327%
35−40
−327%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+276%
37
−276%
Valorant 220−230
+139%
95−100
−139%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 127
+182%
45−50
−182%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+384%
18−20
−384%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+343%
21−24
−343%
Dota 2 147
+101%
70−75
−101%
Far Cry 5 91
+160%
35−40
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 130
+189%
45−50
−189%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+333%
27−30
−333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 143
+286%
35−40
−286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+275%
20
−275%
Valorant 197
+105%
95−100
−105%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 114
+83.9%
60−65
−83.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+244%
75−80
−244%
Grand Theft Auto V 43
+187%
14−16
−187%
Metro Exodus 56
+367%
12−14
−367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+237%
50−55
−237%
Valorant 260−270
+128%
110−120
−128%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+288%
24−27
−288%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+422%
9−10
−422%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+332%
21−24
−332%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+356%
24−27
−356%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+289%
18−20
−289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+375%
16−18
−375%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+377%
21−24
−377%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+195%
21−24
−195%
Metro Exodus 37
+517%
6−7
−517%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+315%
13
−315%
Valorant 240−250
+338%
55−60
−338%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+462%
12−14
−462%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Dota 2 78
+105%
35−40
−105%
Far Cry 5 59
+436%
10−12
−436%
Forza Horizon 4 77
+328%
18−20
−328%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+450%
8−9
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 58
+480%
10−11
−480%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 44
+340%
10−11
−340%

This is how Radeon VII and Quadro M2200 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon VII is 191% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon VII is 350% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon VII is 329% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon VII is 517% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Radeon VII surpassed Quadro M2200 in all 67 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.89 10.79
Recency 7 February 2019 11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 55 Watt

Radeon VII has a 288.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M2200, on the other hand, has 436.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon VII is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon VII is a desktop card while Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon VII
Radeon VII
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2872 votes

Rate Radeon VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 380 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon VII or Quadro M2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.