Radeon Graphics vs Quadro M2200

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	390	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	11
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	1.03	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N17P-Q3	Renoir
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 January 2017 (7 years ago)	no data
Current price	$1967	$174

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	448
Core clock speed	694 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	1870 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	66.30	42.00

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro M2200 and Radeon Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	IGP
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	5508 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	88 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	no data
CUDA	5.2	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---