HD Graphics 2500 vs Radeon VII

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon VII and HD Graphics 2500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon VII
2019
16 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
41.89
+6060%

VII outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 6060% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking931186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.87no data
Power efficiency9.97no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameVega 20Ivy Bridge GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 February 2019 (6 years ago)1 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384048
Core clock speed1400 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1750 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate420.06.900
Floating-point processing power13.44 TFLOPS0.1104 TFLOPS
ROPs641
TMUs2406

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length280 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.0
OpenGL4.64.0
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon VII 41.89
+6060%
HD Graphics 2500 0.68

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon VII 37881
+10708%
HD Graphics 2500 351

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon VII 62128
+3118%
HD Graphics 2500 1931

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon VII 27449
+8532%
HD Graphics 2500 318

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon VII 146094
+5509%
HD Graphics 2500 2605

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD125
+1463%
8
−1463%
1440p81
+8000%
1−2
−8000%
4K600−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.59no data
1440p8.63no data
4K11.65no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
+5900%
2−3
−5900%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+1214%
7−8
−1214%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+4550%
2−3
−4550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
+5900%
2−3
−5900%
Battlefield 5 136
+6700%
2−3
−6700%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+1214%
7−8
−1214%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+4550%
2−3
−4550%
Far Cry 5 99
+9800%
1−2
−9800%
Fortnite 195
+6400%
3−4
−6400%
Forza Horizon 4 163
+3975%
4−5
−3975%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+11600%
1−2
−11600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 157
+1863%
8−9
−1863%
Valorant 220−230
+690%
27−30
−690%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
+5900%
2−3
−5900%
Battlefield 5 137
+6750%
2−3
−6750%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+1214%
7−8
−1214%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+2217%
12
−2217%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+4550%
2−3
−4550%
Dota 2 160
+1233%
12−14
−1233%
Far Cry 5 95
+9400%
1−2
−9400%
Fortnite 154
+7600%
2−3
−7600%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+3825%
4−5
−3825%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+11600%
1−2
−11600%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+11000%
1−2
−11000%
Metro Exodus 88 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 158
+1875%
8−9
−1875%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+3375%
4−5
−3375%
Valorant 220−230
+690%
27−30
−690%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 127
+6250%
2−3
−6250%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+1214%
7−8
−1214%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+4550%
2−3
−4550%
Dota 2 147
+1125%
12−14
−1125%
Far Cry 5 91
+9000%
1−2
−9000%
Forza Horizon 4 130
+3150%
4−5
−3150%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+11600%
1−2
−11600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 143
+1688%
8−9
−1688%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+1775%
4−5
−1775%
Valorant 197
+579%
27−30
−579%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 114
+11300%
1−2
−11300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+13500%
2−3
−13500%
Grand Theft Auto V 43 0−1
Metro Exodus 56 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+4275%
4−5
−4275%
Valorant 260−270
+6400%
4−5
−6400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+10000%
1−2
−10000%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 0−1
Far Cry 5 95−100
+9400%
1−2
−9400%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+5600%
2−3
−5600%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+10400%
1−2
−10400%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+313%
14−16
−313%
Metro Exodus 37 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54 0−1
Valorant 240−250
+5925%
4−5
−5925%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+7200%
1−2
−7200%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Dota 2 78
+7700%
1−2
−7700%
Far Cry 5 59
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Forza Horizon 4 77
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 58
+2800%
2−3
−2800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 44
+2100%
2−3
−2100%

This is how Radeon VII and HD Graphics 2500 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon VII is 1463% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon VII is 8000% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon VII is 13500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Radeon VII surpassed HD Graphics 2500 in all 36 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.89 0.68
Recency 7 February 2019 1 April 2012
Chip lithography 7 nm 22 nm

Radeon VII has a 6060.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon VII is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon VII
Radeon VII
Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2872 votes

Rate Radeon VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1456 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon VII or HD Graphics 2500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.