GeForce 9200M GS vs Radeon VII

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking75not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money65.99no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVega 20NB9M-GE
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 February 2019 (5 years ago)3 June 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data
Current price$160 (0.2x MSRP)$180

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38408
CUDA coresno data8
Core clock speed1400 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1750 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,230 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate420.04.400
Floating-point performanceno data22.4 gflops
Gigaflopsno data31

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon VII and GeForce 9200M GS compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB256 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s11.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon VII 16690
+14936%
9200M GS 111

Radeon VII outperforms GeForce 9200M GS by 14936% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Radeon VII 62128
+16579%
9200M GS 373

Radeon VII outperforms GeForce 9200M GS by 16579% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 7 February 2019 3 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 13 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon VII and GeForce 9200M GS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon VII is a desktop card while GeForce 9200M GS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon VII
Radeon VII
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
GeForce 9200M GS

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2835 votes

Rate Radeon VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 20 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.