GeForce 8400 SE vs Radeon RX Vega Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1474
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.25
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVega MobileG86S
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2018 (7 years ago)1 August 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179216
Core clock speedno data459 MHz
Number of transistorsno data210 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.672
Floating-point processing powerno data0.02938 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2018 1 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 50 Watt

RX Vega Mobile has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

8400 SE, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega Mobile and GeForce 8400 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega Mobile is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8400 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega Mobile
Radeon RX Vega Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE
GeForce 8400 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 400 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 8 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega Mobile or GeForce 8400 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.