Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega MobileTU104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2018 (7 years ago)8 June 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923072 ×2
Core clock speedno data1035 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1530 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rateno data293.8 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data9.4 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data64 ×2
TMUsno data192 ×2
Tensor Coresno data384 ×2
Ray Tracing Coresno data48 ×2
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2018 8 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 110 Watt

RX Vega Mobile has 22.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 X2 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega Mobile and Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega Mobile
Radeon RX Vega Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 400 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega Mobile or Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.