Radeon RX Vega Mobile vs GeForce 8400 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1325not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.75no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG86Vega Mobile
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 April 2007 (18 years ago)7 January 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161792
Core clock speed459 MHzno data
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate3.672no data
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Standard memory config per GPU256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12_1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 7 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 90 Watt

8400 GS has 125% lower power consumption.

RX Vega Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 GS and Radeon RX Vega Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 GS is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
GeForce 8400 GS
AMD Radeon RX Vega Mobile
Radeon RX Vega Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 676 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 400 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 GS or Radeon RX Vega Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.