UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs Radeon RX Vega XL

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated853
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.77
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameVega 10Gen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 August 2017 (7 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358424
Core clock speed1500 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1630 MHz800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate365.1no data
ROPs64no data
TMUs224no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width2048 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1890 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 5525% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega XL and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega XL is a desktop card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega XL
Radeon RX Vega XL
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX Vega XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 58 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.