Radeon R8 M535DX vs RX Vega Nano

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated975
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameVega 10Meso
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data18 April 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096320
Core clock speed1200 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHz891 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Wattno data
Texture fill rate395.817.82
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5702 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs25620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length152 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1600 MBpsSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.76.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

RX Vega Nano has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega Nano and Radeon R8 M535DX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega Nano is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R8 M535DX is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
Radeon RX Vega Nano
AMD Radeon R8 M535DX
Radeon R8 M535DX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 34 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M535DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega Nano or Radeon R8 M535DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.