Playstation 3 RSX vs Radeon RX Vega Nano

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameVega 10RSX-CXD2991
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data11 November 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Core clock speed1200 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt81 Watt
Texture fill rate395.8no data
ROPs64no data
TMUs256no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length152 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width2048 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1600 MBps1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6ES 1.1
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 81 Watt

RX Vega Nano has a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Playstation 3 RSX, on the other hand, has 116% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega Nano and Playstation 3 RSX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
Radeon RX Vega Nano
NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX
Playstation 3 RSX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 85 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega Nano or Playstation 3 RSX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.