RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Radeon RX Vega M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M
2018
15 Watt
14.83

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms M by a whopping 358% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking36920
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency79.6578.13
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameVegaGB203
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5128960
Core clock speed720 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate38.08374.4
Floating-point processing powerno data23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs32280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L1 Cacheno data8.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M 14.83
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 67.89
+358%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M 6558
Samples: 380
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 30019
+358%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.83 67.89
Recency 1 February 2018 11 August 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt

RX Vega M has 366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has a 357.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M
Radeon RX Vega M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.