RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell vs Radeon RX Vega M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking373not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency79.82no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameVegaGB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)21 October 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51214080
Core clock speed720 MHz1740 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz2377 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate38.081,045.9
Floating-point processing powerno data66.94 TFLOPS
ROPs8176
TMUs32440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110
L1 Cacheno data13.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared72 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.34 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 21 October 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

RX Vega M has 1900% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M
Radeon RX Vega M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.