NV25 A2 vs Radeon RX Vega M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code name	Vega	NV25 A2
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)	no data
Current price	$972	no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	no data
Core clock speed	720 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1190 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,500 million	63 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	38.08	no data
Floating-point performance	1,219 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	no data
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	no data
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12.0	8.1
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.3
OpenCL	2.0	N/A
Vulkan	no data	N/A

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography

14 nm

150 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---