Radeon RX Vega 11 vs RX Vega M GL

Place in performance ranking	440	574
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.51	0.72
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code name	Polaris 22	Vega Raven Ridge
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)	26 October 2017 (6 years ago)
Current price	$1307	$475

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega M GL has 249% better value for money than RX Vega 11.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	704
Core clock speed	931 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz	1240 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.88	61.60
Floating-point performance	2,588 gflops	1,760 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon RX Vega 11 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	IGP	IGP
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1400 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL 9.36
+70.8%

RX Vega 11 5.48

RX Vega M GL outperforms RX Vega 11 by 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega M GL 3616
+70.7%

RX Vega 11 2118

RX Vega M GL outperforms RX Vega 11 by 71% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 +55.2%	29 −55.2%
1440p	10−12 +66.7%	6 −66.7%
4K	18−21 +50%	12 −50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

18−20

no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

18−20

no data

4K
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

7−8

no data

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
+80%

5−6

−80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20 +100%	10−11 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Battlefield 5	23 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Far Cry 5	22 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	25 +78.6%	14−16 −78.6%
Forza Horizon 4	38 +81%	21−24 −81%
Hitman 3	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Metro Exodus	33 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20 +100%	10−11 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16 +77.8%	9−10 −77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Far Cry 5	19 +90%	10−11 −90%
Far Cry New Dawn	19 +90%	10−11 −90%
Forza Horizon 4	78 +73.3%	45−50 −73.3%
Hitman 3	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Metro Exodus	8 +100%	4−5 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	11 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Far Cry 5	14 +75%	8−9 −75%
Forza Horizon 4	29 +81.3%	16−18 −81.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	15 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

+87.5%

8−9
−87.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Hitman 3	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

+100%

5−6
−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Hitman 3	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4 +100%	2−3 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	12 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%