Radeon RX 560 Mobile vs RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540X 630 E9173 PCIe RX 540 RX 550 Mobile RX 550X Mobile RX 560X Mobile RX 580 Mobile RX 640 RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GL
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540 540X 550 Mobile 550X Mobile 560 Mobile 560X Mobile 570 Mobile 570X Mobile 580 Mobile 580X Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon RX 560 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.39

560 Mobile outperforms M GL by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
RX 560 Mobile RX 560 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking505481
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.67
Power efficiency11.1212.24
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 22Baffin
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)5 January 2017 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801024
Core clock speed931 MHz1175 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1275 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8876.93
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS2.462 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8064
L1 Cache320 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−22.9%
43
+22.9%
4K30−35
−20%
36
+20%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.33
4Kno data2.78

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
−52.6%
87
+52.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−44.1%
49
+44.1%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−7.6%
150−160
+7.6%
Dota 2 65−70
−7.2%
70−75
+7.2%
Fortnite 55−60
−10.5%
63
+10.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−11.4%
35−40
+11.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−32.4%
45
+32.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−40%
35
+40%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
−7.2%
70−75
+7.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+162%
13
−162%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+25%
20
−25%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+14%
50
−14%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40
−8.6%
35−40
+8.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−300%
36
+300%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and RX 560 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 560 Mobile is 23% faster in 1080p
  • RX 560 Mobile is 20% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 162% faster.
  • in Fortnite, with 4K resolution and the Epic Preset, the RX 560 Mobile is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL performs better in 3 tests (5%)
  • RX 560 Mobile performs better in 14 tests (23%)
  • there's a draw in 43 tests (72%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.39 10.33
Recency 1 February 2018 5 January 2017

RX Vega M GL has an age advantage of 1 year.

RX 560 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 10% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon RX 560 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
RX 560 Mobile Radeon RX 560 Mobile
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 775M GeForce GTX 775M
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
RTX 3000 X2 Mobile RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
RX 9070 GRE 16 GB 9070 GRE 16 GB
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 Iris Plus Graphics 640
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
HD 6990 HD 6990
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
FirePro D700 D700
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
Sky 500 Sky 500
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
HD 6970 X2 HD 6970 X2
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
GeForce MX230 MX230

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 56 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Radeon RX 560 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.