Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, including specs and performance data.


RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.39

Pro M GL outperforms M GL by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking505464
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.1213.08
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 22Polaris 22
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)24 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801280
Core clock speed931 MHz931 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1011 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8880.88
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS2.588 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8080
L1 Cache320 KB320 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s179.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 9.39
Pro WX Vega M GL 11.04
+17.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3933
Samples: 328
Pro WX Vega M GL 4617
+17.4%
Samples: 12

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−30%
52
+30%
4K14−16
−28.6%
18
+28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
−15.8%
65−70
+15.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−13.2%
160−170
+13.2%
Dota 2 65−70
−13%
75−80
+13%
Fortnite 55−60
−15.8%
65−70
+15.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−20%
40−45
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−76%
44
+76%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
−13%
75−80
+13%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+4.2%
24
−4.2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−15.8%
65−70
+15.8%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−10%
21−24
+10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−36.4%
15
+36.4%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and Pro WX Vega M GL compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX Vega M GL is 30% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX Vega M GL is 29% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 4% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX Vega M GL is 76% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL performs better in 1 test (2%)
  • Pro WX Vega M GL performs better in 16 tests (27%)
  • there's a draw in 43 tests (72%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.39 11.04
Recency 1 February 2018 24 April 2018

Pro WX Vega M GL has a 18% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.