RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.39

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms M GL by a whopping 306% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking503134
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.1125.53
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 22AD106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12804608
Core clock speed931 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88244.1
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs80144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cache320 KB4.5 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 9.39
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 38.16
+306%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3926
Samples: 314
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 15957
+306%
Samples: 293

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
−304%
230−240
+304%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−282%
550−600
+282%
Dota 2 65−70
−306%
280−290
+306%
Fortnite 55−60
−304%
230−240
+304%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−300%
140−150
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
−306%
280−290
+306%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−304%
230−240
+304%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−300%
80−85
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40
−300%
140−150
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.39 38.16
Recency 1 February 2018 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 115 Watt

RX Vega M GL has 76.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 306.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.