Radeon RX Vega M GL vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile with Radeon RX Vega M GL, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
55.87
+495%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms M GL by a whopping 495% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking49503
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency35.8011.11
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameAD103Polaris 22
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)1 February 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores97281280
Core clock speed1425 MHz931 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHz1011 MHz
Number of transistors45,900 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate643.080.88
Floating-point processing power41.15 TFLOPS2.588 TFLOPS
ROPs11232
TMUs30480
Tensor Cores304no data
Ray Tracing Cores76no data
L1 Cache9.5 MB320 KB
L2 Cache64 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s179.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 55.87
+495%
RX Vega M GL 9.39

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 23363
+495%
Samples: 359
RX Vega M GL 3926
Samples: 314

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 17 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 55.87 9.39
Recency 21 March 2023 1 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 65 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 495% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

RX Vega M GL, on the other hand, has 84.6% lower power consumption.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M GL is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 70 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile or Radeon RX Vega M GL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.