GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

Place in the ranking	451	73
Place by popularity	not in top-100	56
Power efficiency	10.69	27.43
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Polaris 22	AD107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	3072
Core clock speed	931 MHz	1545 MHz
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz	1890 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.88	181.4
Floating-point processing power	2.588 TFLOPS	11.61 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	96
Tensor Cores	no data	96
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL 10.09

RTX 4060 Mobile 45.83
+354%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3878

RTX 4060 Mobile 17621
+354%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 −363%	111 +363%
1440p	12−14 −417%	62 +417%
4K	8−9 −388%	39 +388%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite	55−60 −341%	260−270 +341%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −349%	350−400 +349%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2	35−40 −314%	149 +314%
Fortnite	55−60 −224%	190−200 +224%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 −294%	142 +294%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −171%	210−220 +171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −457%	160−170 +457%
World of Tanks	140−150 −92.4%	270−280 +92.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2	35−40 −333%	156 +333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −171%	210−220 +171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −333%	130−140 +333%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

55−60
−341%

260−270

+341%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −280%	76 +280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −280%	76 +280%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2	20−22 −530%	126 +530%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −348%	130−140 +348%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

10−12

−309%

45−50
+309%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	96 +0%	96 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	126 +0%	126 +0%
Elden Ring	134 +0%	134 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	95 +0%	95 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	50 +0%	50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	267 +0%	267 +0%
Metro Exodus	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	80 +0%	80 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	42 +0%	42 +0%
Elden Ring	138 +0%	138 +0%
Far Cry 5	101 +0%	101 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	215 +0%	215 +0%
Metro Exodus	37 +0%	37 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	72 +0%	72 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 +0%	39 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	187 +0%	187 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	85 +0%	85 +0%
Elden Ring	106 +0%	106 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	85 +0%	85 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
World of Tanks	290−300 +0%	290−300 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45 +0%	45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24 +0%	24 +0%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	127 +0%	127 +0%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	76 +0%	76 +0%
Valorant	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	25 +0%	25 +0%
Dota 2	76 +0%	76 +0%
Elden Ring	52 +0%	52 +0%
Metro Exodus	37 +0%	37 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +0%	10 +0%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Fortnite	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	62 +0%	62 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and RTX 4060 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Mobile is 363% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 Mobile is 417% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 Mobile is 388% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4060 Mobile is 530% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4060 Mobile is ahead in 11 tests (17%)
there's a draw in 52 tests (83%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.09	45.83
Recency	1 February 2018	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	115 Watt

RX Vega M GL has 76.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 354.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.