GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
VS
GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q MX350

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce MX350, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
10.09
+38%

RX Vega M GL outperforms MX350 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking449538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.7125.22
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 22GP107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)10 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280640
Core clock speed931 MHz747 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz937 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8829.98
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS1.199 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s56.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL 10.09
+38%
GeForce MX350 7.31

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3878
+37.9%
GeForce MX350 2812

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+29.6%
27
−29.6%
1440p40−45
+29%
31
−29%
4K35−40
+34.6%
26
−34.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40
−41.7%
51
+41.7%
Fortnite 55−60
+37.2%
40−45
−37.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+2.9%
35
−2.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−9%
85
+9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
World of Tanks 140−150
+20.8%
120
−20.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
−111%
76
+111%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+32.2%
55−60
−32.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 20−22
−50%
30
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Elden Ring 20
+0%
20
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 32
+0%
32
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+0%
32
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+0%
4
+0%
Elden Ring 13
+0%
13
+0%
Far Cry 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 25
+0%
25
+0%
Metro Exodus 17
+0%
17
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 21
+0%
21
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
+0%
3
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 19
+0%
19
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Elden Ring 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
World of Tanks 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Elden Ring 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and GeForce MX350 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL is 30% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega M GL is 29% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega M GL is 35% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 37% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX350 is 111% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL is ahead in 7 tests (11%)
  • GeForce MX350 is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • there's a draw in 52 tests (83%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.09 7.31
Recency 1 February 2018 10 February 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 20 Watt

RX Vega M GL has a 38% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce MX350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 225% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX350 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GeForce MX350
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 670MX SLI GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
RX 540 Radeon RX 540
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
R9 M390 Radeon R9 M390
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4650 Mobility Radeon HD 4650
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
MX450 25W GeForce MX450 25W
RX Vega M Radeon RX Vega M
vs
GRID A100A GRID A100A
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
Playstation 4 Slim GPU Playstation 4 Slim GPU
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
T1000 8 GB T1000 8 GB
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
vs
A10G A10G
RX 550 640SP Radeon RX 550 640SP
vs
RX 640 Radeon RX 640
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
vs
GTX 1080 11Gbps GeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps
R7 A360 Radeon R7 A360
vs
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1639 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.