Quadro P4200 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

VS
Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 with Quadro P4200, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL / 870
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
11.89

P4200 outperforms RX Vega M GL / 870 by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega M GL / 870 RX Vega M GL / 870
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking390230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.4917.19
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameVega Kaby Lake-GGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2018 (7 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802304
Core clock speed931 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1647 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data237.2
Floating-point processing powerno data7.589 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
−74.4%
75−80
+74.4%
1440p28
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%
4K14
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−97%
65−70
+97%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−88.9%
130−140
+88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−88.9%
50−55
+88.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−97%
65−70
+97%
Battlefield 5 62
−51.6%
90−95
+51.6%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−88.9%
130−140
+88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−88.9%
50−55
+88.9%
Far Cry 5 42
−88.1%
75−80
+88.1%
Fortnite 86
−36%
110−120
+36%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−70.9%
90−95
+70.9%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−82.9%
75−80
+82.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%
Valorant 110−120
−46.8%
160−170
+46.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−97%
65−70
+97%
Battlefield 5 52
−80.8%
90−95
+80.8%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−88.9%
130−140
+88.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
−41.7%
250−260
+41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−88.9%
50−55
+88.9%
Dota 2 85−90
−42.4%
120−130
+42.4%
Far Cry 5 39
−103%
75−80
+103%
Fortnite 56
−109%
110−120
+109%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−70.9%
90−95
+70.9%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−82.9%
75−80
+82.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
−110%
85−90
+110%
Metro Exodus 24
−117%
50−55
+117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
−73.2%
70−75
+73.2%
Valorant 110−120
−46.8%
160−170
+46.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 48
−95.8%
90−95
+95.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−88.9%
50−55
+88.9%
Dota 2 85−90
−42.4%
120−130
+42.4%
Far Cry 5 36
−119%
75−80
+119%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−70.9%
90−95
+70.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−196%
70−75
+196%
Valorant 110−120
−46.8%
160−170
+46.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 38
−208%
110−120
+208%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−72.2%
160−170
+72.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−115%
40−45
+115%
Metro Exodus 14
−129%
30−35
+129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 62
−181%
170−180
+181%
Valorant 130−140
−48.2%
200−210
+48.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 34
−94.1%
65−70
+94.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−109%
21−24
+109%
Far Cry 5 24
−125%
50−55
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−90.6%
60−65
+90.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−100%
40−45
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24
−133%
55−60
+133%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
−51.7%
40−45
+51.7%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−150%
35−40
+150%
Valorant 70−75
−97.1%
130−140
+97.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16
−125%
35−40
+125%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Dota 2 45−50
−66%
75−80
+66%
Far Cry 5 12
−125%
27−30
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−90.9%
40−45
+90.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−108%
24−27
+108%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9
−189%
24−27
+189%

This is how RX Vega M GL / 870 and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 74% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4200 is 79% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P4200 is 71% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Epic Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 208% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P4200 surpassed RX Vega M GL / 870 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 11.89 21.70
Recency 7 January 2018 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

RX Vega M GL / 870 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 53.8% lower power consumption.

Quadro P4200, on the other hand, has a 82.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
ATI WinBoost WinBoost
vs
RTX 4070 GDDR6 RTX 4070 GDDR6
ATI Graphics Xpression Graphics Xpression
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
ATI Rage 128 VR AGP Rage 128 VR AGP
vs
Arc B570 Arc B570
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
vs
Radeon 660M 660M
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
T550 Mobile T550 Mobile
RX 550X RX 550X
vs
GeForce MX330 MX330
RX 550X 640SP RX 550X 640SP
vs
RX 5900 5900
530X Mobile 530X Mobile
vs
Apple M1 GPU M1 GPU
RX 560X Mobile RX 560X Mobile
vs
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro P4200 P4200
vs
RX 7900 XT RX 7900 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1.5 118 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 58 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 or Quadro P4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.