GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

Place in the ranking	371	2
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	17.65
Power efficiency	14.90	15.34
Architecture	Vega (2017−2020)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Vega Kaby Lake-G	AD102
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2018 (6 years ago)	28 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	14592
Core clock speed	931 MHz	2280 MHz
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz	2520 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	425 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	1,149
Floating-point processing power	no data	73.54 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	176
TMUs	no data	456
Tensor Cores	no data	456
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	114

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	no data	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	1,008 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	41 −559%	270−280 +559%
1440p	28 −543%	180−190 +543%
4K	13 −554%	85−90 +554%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	5.92
1440p	no data	8.88
4K	no data	18.81

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24
−536%

140−150

+536%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	47 −538%	300−310 +538%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −552%	150−160 +552%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −552%	300−310 +552%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	33 −567%	220−230 +567%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −536%	140−150 +536%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −567%	220−230 +567%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −567%	260−270 +567%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −545%	600−650 +545%
Hitman 3	27−30 −567%	180−190 +567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −516%	450−500 +516%
Metro Exodus	53 −560%	350−400 +560%
Red Dead Redemption 2	48 −525%	300−310 +525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −552%	300−310 +552%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −558%	500−550 +558%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −567%	220−230 +567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −552%	150−160 +552%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −552%	300−310 +552%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30 −567%	200−210 +567%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −536%	140−150 +536%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −567%	220−230 +567%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −567%	260−270 +567%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −545%	600−650 +545%
Hitman 3	27−30 −567%	180−190 +567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −516%	450−500 +516%
Metro Exodus	41 −559%	270−280 +559%
Red Dead Redemption 2	37 −549%	240−250 +549%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −552%	300−310 +552%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −547%	220−230 +547%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −558%	500−550 +558%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	23 −552%	150−160 +552%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −552%	150−160 +552%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20 −550%	130−140 +550%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −536%	140−150 +536%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −567%	220−230 +567%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −545%	600−650 +545%
Hitman 3	27−30 −567%	180−190 +567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −516%	450−500 +516%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −552%	300−310 +552%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24 −567%	160−170 +567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −558%	500−550 +558%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

32
−556%

210−220

+556%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −543%	180−190 +543%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −536%	140−150 +536%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	17 −547%	110−120 +547%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −536%	70−75 +536%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12 −567%	80−85 +567%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −516%	450−500 +516%
Hitman 3	16−18 −547%	110−120 +547%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −555%	190−200 +555%
Metro Exodus	27 −567%	180−190 +567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −540%	160−170 +540%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −567%	100−105 +567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −525%	550−600 +525%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21
−567%

140−150

+567%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −543%	90−95 +543%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −550%	65−70 +550%
Hitman 3	10−11 −550%	65−70 +550%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −534%	450−500 +534%
Metro Exodus	15 −567%	100−105 +567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 −543%	90−95 +543%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	11 −536%	70−75 +536%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4 −500%	24−27 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −532%	120−130 +532%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −554%	85−90 +554%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−550%

65−70
+550%

This is how RX Vega M GL / 870 and RTX 4090 D compete in popular games:

RTX 4090 D is 559% faster in 1080p
RTX 4090 D is 543% faster in 1440p
RTX 4090 D is 554% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.93	93.82
Recency	7 January 2018	28 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	425 Watt

RX Vega M GL / 870 has 553.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 D, on the other hand, has a 573.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 D is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.