Arc B570 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 373 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 14.83 | no data |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | Xe2 (2024) |
| GPU code name | Vega Kaby Lake-G | BMG-G21 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2018 (7 years ago) | 12 December 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $219 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 19,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 360.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 11.52 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 80 |
| TMUs | no data | 144 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 144 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 18 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 272 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 10 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 2375 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 380.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 January 2018 | 12 December 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 10 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 150 Watt |
RX Vega M GL / 870 has 130.8% lower power consumption.
Arc B570, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 and Arc B570. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook card while Arc B570 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
