Radeon RX 6400 vs RX Vega M GH

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 6300 Radeon RX 6300 XT Radeon RX 6400 Radeon RX 6500 XT Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600 LE Radeon RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6800 Radeon RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6850 XT Radeon RX 6900 Radeon RX 6900 XT Radeon RX 6900 XTX Radeon RX 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GH with Radeon RX 6400, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GH
2018
4 GB HBM2, 100 Watt
16.91

RX 6400 outperforms RX Vega M GH by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
RX 6400 RX 6400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking333292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data53.46
Power efficiency11.7225.66
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 22Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536768
Core clock speed1063 MHz1923 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz2321 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate114.2111.4
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs9648
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GH 16.91
RX 6400 19.62
+16%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GH 6579
RX 6400 7633
+16%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
−10.2%
65−70
+10.2%
1440p38
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
4K28
−7.1%
30−35
+7.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.45
1440pno data3.98
4Kno data5.30

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Battlefield 5 81
−11.1%
90−95
+11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%
Fortnite 85−90
−12.4%
100−105
+12.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−13.6%
75−80
+13.6%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−10.2%
65−70
+10.2%
Valorant 120−130
−9.4%
140−150
+9.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Battlefield 5 66
−13.6%
75−80
+13.6%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−15.4%
240−250
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Dota 2 108
−11.1%
120−130
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 51
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Fortnite 85−90
−12.4%
100−105
+12.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−13.6%
75−80
+13.6%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Metro Exodus 32
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−10.2%
65−70
+10.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Valorant 120−130
−9.4%
140−150
+9.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Dota 2 95
−15.8%
110−120
+15.8%
Far Cry 5 47
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−13.6%
75−80
+13.6%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−10.2%
65−70
+10.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Valorant 120−130
−9.4%
140−150
+9.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
−12.4%
100−105
+12.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−10.2%
130−140
+10.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−13.9%
180−190
+13.9%
Valorant 160−170
−11.8%
180−190
+11.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 43
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Metro Exodus 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Valorant 85−90
−12.4%
100−105
+12.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
−14%
65−70
+14%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%

This is how RX Vega M GH and RX 6400 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6400 is 10% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6400 is 5% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6400 is 7% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 16.91 19.62
Recency 1 February 2018 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 53 Watt

RX 6400 has a 16% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 88.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GH in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GH is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7 Cores iGPU
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
vs
RX 580 2048SP Radeon RX 580 2048SP
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
GTX 965M SLI GeForce GTX 965M SLI
RX 5600M 5600M
vs
RX Vega M GH Vega M GH
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
vs
RX Vega M GH Vega M GH
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Intel Xe Graphics G7
vs
RX Vega M GH Vega M GH
RX Vega M GH Vega M GH
vs
RTX 3060 3060
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
vs
RX Vega M GH Vega M GH
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
vs
RX Vega M GH Vega M GH
RX Vega M GH Vega M GH
vs
RTX 4090 4090
Steam Deck GPU AMD Deck GPU
vs
RX Vega M GH Vega M GH
Arc 3 A370M Intel 3 A370M
vs
RX Vega M GH Vega M GH
Arc A770M Arc A770M
vs
RX Vega M GH Vega M GH

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2080 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GH or Radeon RX 6400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.