Radeon RX 6300 vs RX Vega M GH

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GH with Radeon RX 6300, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GH
2018
4 GB HBM2, 100 Watt
17.01
+14.4%

RX Vega M GH outperforms RX 6300 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking299333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.72no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameVega Kaby Lake-GNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2018 (6 years ago)no data
Current price$1031 $1492

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536768
Core clock speed1063 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1190 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate114.297.92
Floating-point performance3,656 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega M GH and Radeon RX 6300 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x HDMI 2.1
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GH 17.01
+14.4%
RX 6300 14.87

RX Vega M GH outperforms RX 6300 by 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega M GH 6570
+14.4%
RX 6300 5741

RX Vega M GH outperforms RX 6300 by 14% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD61
+22%
50−55
−22%
1440p45
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
4K27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 39
+30%
30−33
−30%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 52
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+21.5%
65−70
−21.5%
Hitman 3 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 105
+16.7%
90−95
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+26.7%
45−50
−26.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
+30%
30−33
−30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85
+21.4%
70−75
−21.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Battlefield 5 33
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+21.5%
65−70
−21.5%
Hitman 3 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%
Metro Exodus 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 68
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+20%
50−55
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+21.5%
65−70
−21.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 56
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
+26.7%
45−50
−26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 39
+30%
30−33
−30%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Hitman 3 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Hitman 3 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

This is how RX Vega M GH and RX 6300 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GH is 22% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega M GH is 29% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega M GH is 29% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.01 14.87
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 32 Watt

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GH is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
AMD Radeon RX 6300
Radeon RX 6300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 40 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.