GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

Place in performance ranking	299	365
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.72	no data
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Vega Kaby Lake-G	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 January 2018 (6 years ago)	April 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price	$1031	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	768
Core clock speed	1063 MHz	1366 MHz
Boost clock speed	1190 MHz	1442 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	114.2	no data
Floating-point performance	3,656 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega M GH and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 MB
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz	1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	204.8 GB/s	84 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Multi-Projection	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	no data
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GH 17.01
+32.8%

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.81

Radeon RX Vega M GH outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega M GH 10248
+60.1%

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401

Radeon RX Vega M GH outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by 60% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	61 +35.6%	45−50 −35.6%
1440p	45 +50%	30−35 −50%
4K	27 +50%	18−21 −50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

39
+44.4%

27−30

−44.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	44 +46.7%	30−33 −46.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +40%	40−45 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	36 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +33.3%	30−33 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	52 +48.6%	35−40 −48.6%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +43.6%	55−60 −43.6%
Hitman 3	30−35 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	105 +40%	75−80 −40%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +42.5%	40−45 −42.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	39 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85 +41.7%	60−65 −41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +51.4%	35−40 −51.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Battlefield 5	33 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	32 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +33.3%	30−33 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +43.6%	55−60 −43.6%
Hitman 3	30−35 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +36%	50−55 −36%
Metro Exodus	26 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	68 +36%	50−55 −36%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60 +33.3%	45−50 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +51.4%	35−40 −51.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21 +50%	14−16 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21 +50%	14−16 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +33.3%	30−33 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +43.6%	55−60 −43.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	56 +40%	40−45 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	57 +42.5%	40−45 −42.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	34 +41.7%	24−27 −41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +51.4%	35−40 −51.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

28
+33.3%

21−24

−33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	39 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	4 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +33.3%	21−24 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
Hitman 3	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	41 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
+33.3%

21−24

−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18 +50%	12−14 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	14 +40%	10−11 −40%
Hitman 3	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21 +50%	14−16 −50%
Metro Exodus	22 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%