GeForce GT 710 PCI vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 317 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 11.82 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 22 | GF119 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 February 2018 (6 years ago) | 2 April 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 1063 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 5,000 million | 292 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 6.480 |
| Floating-point processing power | 3.656 TFLOPS | 0.1555 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 4 |
| TMUs | 96 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | IGP | PCI |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 10.67 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 2.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 February 2018 | 2 April 2012 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 29 Watt |
RX Vega M GH has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
GT 710 PCI, on the other hand, has 244.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GH and GeForce GT 710 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GH is a notebook card while GeForce GT 710 PCI is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
