FirePro W8100 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540X 630 E9173 PCIe RX 540 RX 550 Mobile RX 550X Mobile RX 560 Mobile RX 560X Mobile RX 580 Mobile RX 640 RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GL
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
W2100 W4000 W4100 W4300 W5000 W5100 W7000 W7100 W8000 W8100 W9000 W9100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GH with FirePro W8100, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GH
2018
4 GB HBM2, 100 Watt
15.67

W8100 outperforms M GH by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking376364
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.075.70
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code namePolaris 22Hawaii
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)23 June 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362560
Core clock speed1063 MHz824 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate114.2131.8
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS4.219 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs96160
L1 Cache384 KB640 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s320 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+
HD сomponent video output-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GH 15.67
FirePro W8100 16.29
+4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GH 6555
Samples: 409
FirePro W8100 6812
+3.9%
Samples: 59

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
1440p38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
4K28
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 81
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Fortnite 85−90
−2.3%
90−95
+2.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Forza Horizon 5 47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Valorant 120−130
−1.6%
130−140
+1.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 66
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−1.4%
210−220
+1.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Dota 2 108
−1.9%
110−120
+1.9%
Far Cry 5 51
+2%
50−55
−2%
Fortnite 85−90
−2.3%
90−95
+2.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Forza Horizon 5 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 120−130
−1.6%
130−140
+1.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Dota 2 95
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Valorant 120−130
−1.6%
130−140
+1.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
−2.3%
90−95
+2.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−2.6%
120−130
+2.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−3.2%
160−170
+3.2%
Valorant 150−160
−0.6%
160−170
+0.6%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Metro Exodus 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Valorant 85−90
−1.1%
90−95
+1.1%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GH and FirePro W8100 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W8100 is 2% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega M GH is 9% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega M GH is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 15.67 16.29
Recency 1 February 2018 23 June 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 220 Watt

RX Vega M GH has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

FirePro W8100, on the other hand, has a 4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX Vega M GH and FirePro W8100.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GH is a notebook graphics card while FirePro W8100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
P106-100 P106 100
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
HD 6490 HD 6490
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
ATI HD 5730 HD 5730
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
ATI HD 5630 HD 5630
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
ATI HD 5690 HD 5690
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
GTX 860M OEM GTX 860M OEM
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
FirePro W8000 W8000
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
FirePro W9000 W9000
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
FirePro W7000 W7000
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
ATI HD 5570 OEM HD 5570 OEM
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
RX 550X 550X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 51 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 22 votes

Rate FirePro W8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GH or FirePro W8100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.