Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking317not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.87no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)no data
GPU code namePolaris 22no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153638
Core clock speed1063 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1190 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate114.2no data
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs96no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width1024 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 17 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 53 Watt

Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU has an age advantage of 4 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 88.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GH and Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 45 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 198 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.