Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs RX Vega 9

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 9 with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 9
2017
15 Watt
4.78

AI PRO R9700 outperforms 9 by a whopping 1455% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking65813
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.6619.94
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 October 2017 (7 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5764096
Core clock speedno data1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistorsno data53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data747.5
Floating-point processing powerno data47.84 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−1400%
270−280
+1400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−1422%
350−400
+1422%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−1445%
170−180
+1445%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24
−1329%
300−310
+1329%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−1422%
350−400
+1422%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−1400%
240−250
+1400%
Fortnite 22
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1358%
350−400
+1358%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−1445%
170−180
+1445%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−1400%
300−310
+1400%
Valorant 60−65
−1432%
950−1000
+1432%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24
−1329%
300−310
+1329%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−1422%
350−400
+1422%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−1452%
1350−1400
+1452%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
Dota 2 40−45
−1412%
650−700
+1412%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−1400%
240−250
+1400%
Fortnite 16
−1400%
240−250
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1358%
350−400
+1358%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1429%
260−270
+1429%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−1445%
170−180
+1445%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−1400%
300−310
+1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−1438%
200−210
+1438%
Valorant 60−65
−1432%
950−1000
+1432%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−1329%
300−310
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
Dota 2 40−45
−1412%
650−700
+1412%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−1400%
240−250
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1358%
350−400
+1358%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−1445%
170−180
+1445%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−1400%
300−310
+1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−1400%
120−130
+1400%
Valorant 60−65
−1432%
950−1000
+1432%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 9
−1344%
130−140
+1344%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−1438%
600−650
+1438%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−1329%
500−550
+1329%
Valorant 55−60
−1418%
850−900
+1418%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1400%
180−190
+1400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1429%
260−270
+1429%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Valorant 24−27
−1438%
400−450
+1438%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Dota 2 18−20
−1400%
270−280
+1400%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%

This is how RX Vega 9 and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 1400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.78 74.31
Recency 26 October 2017 23 July 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

RX Vega 9 has 1900% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 1454.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 9 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Radeon RX Vega 9
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 28 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 9 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.