RTX A4500 Embedded vs Radeon RX Vega 9

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 9 and RTX A4500 Embedded, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 9
2017
15 Watt
5.54

RTX A4500 Embedded outperforms RX Vega 9 by a whopping 411% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking601197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeGA104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 October 2017 (6 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5765888
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1215 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data223.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−400%
90−95
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−400%
180−190
+400%
Hitman 3 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−386%
170−180
+386%
Metro Exodus 21
−376%
100−105
+376%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−410%
250−260
+410%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−400%
180−190
+400%
Hitman 3 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−386%
170−180
+386%
Metro Exodus 16
−400%
80−85
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−400%
95−100
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−410%
250−260
+410%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−400%
180−190
+400%
Hitman 3 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−386%
170−180
+386%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−400%
40−45
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−410%
250−260
+410%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Hitman 3 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−400%
180−190
+400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Hitman 3 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

This is how RX Vega 9 and RTX A4500 Embedded compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Embedded is 400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.54 28.30
Recency 26 October 2017 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt

RX Vega 9 has 433.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Embedded, on the other hand, has a 410.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 9 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Radeon RX Vega 9
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
RTX A4500 Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 21 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A4500 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.