AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
General info
Technical specs
Memory
Technologies
Benchmarks
Mining
Gaming
Conclusion
Cast your vote
User rating
Advices and comments
General info
Comparison of Radeon RX Vega 8 and GeForce GTX 760M architecture, market type and release date.
Technical specs
Radeon RX Vega 8 and GeForce GTX 760M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon RX Vega 8 and GeForce GTX 760M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
512
768
CUDA cores
no data
768
Core clock speed
no data
657 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
657 MHz
Transistor count
no data
2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
55 Watt
Texture fill rate
no data
42.05
Floating-point performance
no data
1,009 gflops
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon RX Vega 8 and GeForce GTX 760M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
no data
large
Bus support
no data
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface
no data
PCIe 3.0 x16
SLI options
-
+
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon RX Vega 8 and GeForce GTX 760M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
no data
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
no data
2 GB
Standard memory configuration
no data
GDDR5
Memory bus width
no data
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
no data
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
no data
64.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon RX Vega 8 and GeForce GTX 760M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Display Connectors
no data
No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support
no data
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
no data
Up to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display support
no data
Up to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
no data
Up to 3840x2160
HDMI
-
+
HDCP content protection
-
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
-
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
-
+
Technologies
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Radeon RX Vega 8 and GeForce GTX 760M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Blu-Ray 3D Support
-
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
-
+
Optimus
-
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
-
+
API support
APIs supported by Radeon RX Vega 8 and GeForce GTX 760M, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
12 API
Shader Model
no data
5.1
OpenGL
no data
4.5
OpenCL
no data
1.1
Vulkan
-
1.1.126
CUDA
-
+
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Radeon RX Vega 8 and GeForce GTX 760M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
RX Vega 8
6.78 +3.2%
GTX 760M
6.57
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
RX Vega 8
15186
GTX 760M
15900 +4.7%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
RX Vega 8
2142
GTX 760M
2173 +1.4%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
RX Vega 8
2335 +2.8%
GTX 760M
2271
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
RX Vega 8
3537 +5%
GTX 760M
3369
3DMark Vantage Performance
RX Vega 8
10294
GTX 760M
14007 +36.1%
Unigine Heaven 3.0
RX Vega 8
27
GTX 760M
33 +22.2%
Passmark
RX Vega 8
1737 +3.1%
GTX 760M
1684
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon RX Vega 8 and GeForce GTX 760M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
no data
54 Mh/s
Gaming performance
Let's see how good Radeon RX Vega 8 and GeForce GTX 760M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
3.2% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (26 October 2017 vs 30 May 2013)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
Cheaper ($163.00 USD vs $273.00 USD)
More pipelines (768 vs 512)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
So, RX Vega 8 or GTX 760M?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon RX Vega 8 and GeForce GTX 760M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your vote
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
Like
Like
