GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
9.00

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a whopping 559% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking48835
Place by popularity2816
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data83.15
Power efficiency41.4025.59
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVegaAD106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124352
Core clock speedno data2310 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHz2535 MHz
Number of transistorsno data22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rateno data344.8
Floating-point processing powerno data22.06 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data136
Tensor Coresno data136
Ray Tracing Coresno data34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−552%
150−160
+552%
1440p17
−547%
110−120
+547%
4K9
−511%
55−60
+511%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.66
1440pno data3.63
4Kno data7.25

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
−554%
85−90
+554%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
−532%
120−130
+532%
Elden Ring 18
−511%
110−120
+511%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−555%
190−200
+555%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−511%
55−60
+511%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−533%
95−100
+533%
Forza Horizon 4 32
−556%
210−220
+556%
Metro Exodus 27
−530%
170−180
+530%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−536%
210−220
+536%
Valorant 44
−559%
290−300
+559%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−555%
190−200
+555%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−511%
55−60
+511%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−536%
70−75
+536%
Dota 2 29
−555%
190−200
+555%
Elden Ring 22
−536%
140−150
+536%
Far Cry 5 30
−533%
190−200
+533%
Fortnite 50−55
−466%
300−310
+466%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−530%
170−180
+530%
Grand Theft Auto V 19
−532%
120−130
+532%
Metro Exodus 19
−532%
120−130
+532%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 57
−514%
350−400
+514%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12
−525%
75−80
+525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−530%
170−180
+530%
Valorant 14
−543%
90−95
+543%
World of Tanks 48
−525%
300−310
+525%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−555%
190−200
+555%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−511%
55−60
+511%
Dota 2 48
−525%
300−310
+525%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−558%
250−260
+558%
Forza Horizon 4 23
−552%
150−160
+552%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−534%
450−500
+534%
Valorant 37
−549%
240−250
+549%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 9
−511%
55−60
+511%
Elden Ring 12
−525%
75−80
+525%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−511%
55−60
+511%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
−536%
140−150
+536%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
World of Tanks 21
−519%
130−140
+519%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Cyberpunk 2077 2
−500%
12−14
+500%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−532%
120−130
+532%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−525%
100−105
+525%
Metro Exodus 17
−547%
110−120
+547%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%
Valorant 39
−541%
250−260
+541%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Dota 2 10
−550%
65−70
+550%
Elden Ring 6
−483%
35−40
+483%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−550%
65−70
+550%
Metro Exodus 6
−483%
35−40
+483%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 13
−554%
85−90
+554%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−550%
65−70
+550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Dota 2 18
−511%
110−120
+511%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%
Fortnite 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Forza Horizon 4 9
−511%
55−60
+511%
Valorant 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti is 552% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti is 547% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti is 511% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.00 59.33
Recency 7 January 2020 18 May 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 160 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has 966.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 559.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1253 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9126 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.