GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Radeon RX Vega 2 Radeon RX Vega 3 Radeon RX Vega 5 Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 9
VS
GTX 460 GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 SE GTX 460 v2 GTX 465 GTX 470 GTX 480 GTX 490 GTX 660 GTX 750 Ti GTX 960

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with GeForce GTX 465, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
9.03
+31.4%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms GTX 465 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
GTX 465 GTX 465

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking480555
Place by popularity29not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.15
Power efficiency41.962.39
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVegaGF100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (4 years ago)31 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512352
Core clock speedno data607 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data26.75
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8554 TFLOPS
Compute performanceno data30x
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0 x 16
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Memory bandwidthno data102.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.2
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
1440p16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
4K10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data17.44
1440pno data23.25
4Kno data39.86

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Hitman 3 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
Metro Exodus 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Hitman 3 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
Metro Exodus 25
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27
+50%
18−20
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Hitman 3 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21
+50%
14−16
−50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Hitman 3 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Hitman 3 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
+50%
6−7
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GTX 465 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 38% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 33% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 43% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.03 6.87
Recency 7 January 2020 31 May 2010
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 31.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 465 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 465 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 465
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
GTX 870M GeForce GTX 870M
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
HD 6950 Radeon HD 6950
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
HD 6970M Crossfire Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
GT 220 GeForce GT 220
vs
GT 1030 GK107 GeForce GT 1030 GK107
i740 i740
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
8800 GTS 640 GeForce 8800 GTS 640
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GP104 GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104
ATI HD 2400 PRO PCI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
vs
Lakeport Lakeport
GeForce 810A GeForce 810A
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GTX 770 GeForce GTX 770
vs
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 615
vs
Tegra X1 GPU Tegra X1 GPU
GTX 850M GeForce GTX 850M
vs
ATI 9500 PRO Radeon 9500 PRO
R5 (Bristol Ridge) Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
vs
HD Graphics 5000 HD Graphics 5000
Pro 5300 Radeon Pro 5300
vs
Arc A730M Arc A730M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 1118 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 100 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.