GeForce 8200M G vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GeForce 8200M G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 5879% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 494 | 1426 |
| Place by popularity | 32 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 41.13 | no data |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | no data |
| GPU code name | Vega | MCP77MV MCP79MVL |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 January 2020 (5 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2100 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 10 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 23 | -0−1 |
| 1440p | 17 | -0−1 |
| 4K | 9 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
+117%
|
6−7
−117%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 19
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12
+100%
|
6−7
−100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 15
+650%
|
2−3
−650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 32
+540%
|
5−6
−540%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 21 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 27 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 33
+725%
|
4−5
−725%
|
| Valorant | 44 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 11
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
| Dota 2 | 29 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 30
+329%
|
7−8
−329%
|
| Fortnite | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27
+440%
|
5−6
−440%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 13 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 19 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 19 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 57
+1040%
|
5−6
−1040%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+575%
|
4−5
−575%
|
| Valorant | 14 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 48
+380%
|
10−11
−380%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Dota 2 | 48 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+429%
|
7−8
−429%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 23
+360%
|
5−6
−360%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+1320%
|
5−6
−1320%
|
| Valorant | 37 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 9 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 9 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 22
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 21 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+375%
|
4−5
−375%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 17 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
| Valorant | 39
+875%
|
4−5
−875%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 10
−50%
|
14−16
+50%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10
−50%
|
14−16
+50%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 13 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10
−50%
|
14−16
+50%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Dota 2 | 18
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 9−10 | 0−1 |
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 2100% faster.
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 8200M G is 50% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is ahead in 25 tests (86%)
- 8200M G is ahead in 4 tests (14%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.37 | 0.14 |
| Recency | 7 January 2020 | 3 June 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 80 nm |
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 5878.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
