GeForce 8200M G vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GeForce 8200M G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
8.76
+5053%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 5053% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4971423
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Power efficiency41.01no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)no data
GPU code nameVegaMCP77MV MCP79MVL
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5128
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22-0−1
1440p17-0−1
4K10-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+1700%
1−2
−1700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 19
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Battlefield 5 39 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Far Cry 5 21 0−1
Fortnite 47 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Forza Horizon 5 21 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Valorant 80−85
+236%
24−27
−236%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Battlefield 5 33 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 48
+336%
10−12
−336%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+800%
1−2
−800%
Dota 2 51
+467%
9−10
−467%
Far Cry 5 20 0−1
Fortnite 31 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Forza Horizon 5 13 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 19 0−1
Metro Exodus 16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+600%
3−4
−600%
Valorant 80−85
+236%
24−27
−236%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+800%
1−2
−800%
Dota 2 48
+433%
9−10
−433%
Far Cry 5 19 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Forza Horizon 5 14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+367%
3−4
−367%
Valorant 37
+48%
24−27
−48%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 9 0−1
Metro Exodus 10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Valorant 95−100
+9400%
1−2
−9400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5 0−1
Far Cry 5 16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−50%
14−16
+50%
Metro Exodus 6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 40−45
+2100%
2−3
−2100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 18 0−1
Far Cry 5 8
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 2300% faster.
  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the 8200M G is 50% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is ahead in 31 test (97%)
  • 8200M G is ahead in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.76 0.17
Recency 7 January 2020 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 7 nm 80 nm

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 5052.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GeForce 8200M G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1348 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or GeForce 8200M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.